semantic web - Is owl:complementOf same as owl:disjointWith in RDF? -


i puzzled real meaning. if hae class meat, can define not meat class "notmeat". can use owl:complementof here. man , women? can use owl:complementof "woman" not "man"? if not, there way describe disjointness of man , woman class without using owl:disjointwith?

can use property "disjoint" in both class , use property predicate in triples subjects , objects "man" , "woman" class describe disjointness?

the difference complement of class class b such union b equivalent top (thing, resource, or whatever represents individuals in interpretation), while disjoint means , b not share individuals.

for example, if our individuals mammals, can male complement of female. however, if individuals mammals , trees, male , female no longer complement of each other, because there trees, neither. 2 classes still disjoint.


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

javascript - Using jquery append to add option values into a select element not working -

Android soft keyboard reverts to default keyboard on orientation change -

Rendering JButton to get the JCheckBox behavior in a JTable by using images does not update my table -